Commenting on the dowry murder case, the Supreme Court said that there is no doubt that the threat of dowry death is increasing day by day, but at the same time it has been said that many times it has been seen that in such case, those relatives of the husband were implicated. Are given which have no role in the case. The court needs to be vigilant in such a case. The Supreme Court made the above remarks while convicting the accused in the dowry murder case.
The Supreme Court has ruled in the dowry murder case that whenever a case related to dowry murder is seen, it is necessary to keep in mind that this law was made to prevent girls from being burnt for dowry. Can go This law has been enacted to curb social evil like dowry. At the same time, the Supreme Court also said that the trial courts are not serious at the time of the statement of the accused in the dowry murder case, which is a matter of concern and said that many times in the dowry murder case, even the relatives of the husband are implicated without any reason. The Supreme Court convicted the accused husband and other in-laws in the dowry murder case but made the said remark while acquitting them in the abetment case for suicide.
A bench headed by Chief Justice NV Ramana of the Supreme Court said that it sometimes happens that statements of accused are recorded without questioning. In this case, the Punjab Haryana High Court convicted the husband and other in-laws in the case of abetment of dowry murder and self-murder, a decision which was challenged in the Supreme Court. According to the prosecution, on 31 July 1995, the girl’s father was informed by the villagers that his daughter was hospitalized. By the time the woman’s father reached the hospital, she had died of burns.
The husband and others were convicted by the trial court on 11 December 1997 and the Punjab Haryana High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the sentence on 6 November 2008. The Supreme Court said in its judgment that the prosecution side should present all the necessary factors for a dowry murder case. Once it is proved that there has been unnatural death and there is a casualty, then the case goes against the accused under Section-313 of the Indian Evidence Act.
The prosecution has to state that the deceased was tortured for dowry before dying. But it is a matter of concern that when the trial court records the statement of the accused, he does it in a very casual manner. Whereas, the statement of the accused under Section-313 should not be just formal. This section-313 gives the accused the right to be able to clarify all the facts against him. In such a situation, it becomes the responsibility of the court to see that the accused gets full opportunity and can be questioned objectively.
The Supreme Court also said that the cases of dowry deaths are increasing and the court is aware of these threats. But sometimes the family of the husband and the members who do not play the role are also implicated. In such a situation, the court needs to be careful.