Supreme Court News: Death sentence of brother-nephew killer changed to life imprisonment, Supreme Court said – there is scope for improvement in the guilty

0
33

New Delhi
Commuting the sentence of death sentence to life imprisonment, the Supreme Court has said that in the present case it cannot be said that there is no scope for reform and rehabilitation of the convict. In such a situation, the death sentence of the accused of murder is converted into life imprisonment.

It is necessary to see in what state the mind of the criminal was
The Supreme Court said that it is our duty to consider the possibilities of reform and rehabilitation of the accused. It is our duty to consider not only the crime but also the situation of the criminal. It is necessary to see in what state the mind of the criminal was and what is his social and economic condition. Both the deceased and the accused were from village background. There was a property dispute between the two. The petitioner had killed his two brothers and a nephew.

It cannot be said that there is no scope for improvement of the accused.

The Supreme Court said that there is no doubt that he has committed the heinous crime. But the state government did not say that there was no scope for improvement of the accused. The petitioner has committed the offense but he is not a dreaded criminal. This was his first offense. The report from his jail said that his conduct is fine and it cannot be said that there is no scope for his reformation and rehabilitation. So we give alternative punishment. We convert the death sentence to life imprisonment in this case. Since the accused had killed his two brothers and nephew, the punishment in this case would be 30 years of imprisonment.

Seeing their brave soldiers wrapped in the tricolor shroud, people cried bitterly, with tears flowing, the slogans of Vande Mataram-Jai Hind
The trial court and the high court saw the crime, did not consider the condition of the offender
The present case is of Madhya Pradesh. Bhagchandra challenged the decision of the Jabalpur Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in the Supreme Court. The trial court had sentenced Bhagchandra to death in the murder case and on 19 December 2017 the High Court confirmed the death sentence after which the matter came before the Supreme Court. According to the present case, the wife of the deceased Devki Prasad gave a statement that on October 11, 2015, when she came back from the toilet, she saw that her husband’s brother Thakur Das had been murdered in the house with a sharp-edged weapon. Later he also saw the dead body of his son Akhilesh. On being suspicious, she ran towards the field and there she saw that the accused Bhagchandra had hit her husband Devaki Das with a fist and he also died. Devaki’s wife became the first police witness in this case.

The murder was carried out due to a property dispute. After the death sentence from the trial court and the high court, the matter came to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court said that the day the trial court convicted him, he was sentenced to death on the same day and there was not enough opportunity to argue the sentence. The trial court and the high court only looked into the crime but did not consider the mental state and economic and social aspect of the offender.

.

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here